The Readster team
Why we built Readster
You already follow the right sources. Reading them is the problem. Why we built a research tool that reads everything you follow and delivers one cited brief.
We built Readster because our reading pile was winning.
Like most people who read for a living, we already followed the right sources: thirty newsletters, a dozen podcasts, two hundred feeds, and every paper, filing and announcement that mattered. The problem was never finding good sources. The problem was that reading them is a full-time job — and we already had one.
So the tabs piled up. The podcast queue grew. The announcement we needed to see was three days old when we found it. The same story reached us nine times from nine outlets, and the one detail that actually mattered was buried in episode 214 of a podcast we didn't have time for.
The tools we tried
Feed readers make the firehose more pleasant — but you still drink from it, item by item. Read-it-later apps assume you'll come back and read; the queue just moves. Enterprise research platforms solve the synthesis problem properly, but they're sold to institutions at five figures a seat, behind sales calls and procurement.
None of them start from the assumption we kept arriving at: the reading itself is the bottleneck. Not discovery, not organization — triage.
What Readster does instead
Readster reads the sources you already trust — RSS feeds, email newsletters via a private address, podcasts, YouTube channels, Bluesky, and SEC filings for the companies you track — deduplicates them, ranks everything against a watchlist you declared, and delivers one narrative brief every morning.
Three decisions define it:
Every entry is cited. Twenty takes on the same launch become one entry with twenty citations, each linking back to its source. Citations are checked before the brief is sent: a sentence whose citation doesn't resolve is removed, and an entry that can't be traced to a source is dropped. It's a starting point for your own judgment, and a starting point you can't verify is worthless.
Ranking is declared, not inferred. No engagement algorithm guesses what keeps you scrolling. Every item is in your brief because of a topic, company or person you wrote down — and it's labeled with the watchlist entry that put it there. Your watchlist is yours: private, never sold, never used to train models.
The brief ends. On purpose. When it says "that's everything today", that's everything. We think the fear of missing something is exactly what the infinite scroll monetizes, and we wanted out.
The business model, stated plainly
Readster is $20/month, with one revenue stream: subscriptions. No ads, no selling data, no free tier that we'd someday need to monetize into something worse. You've seen what happens to free tools people build workflows on — beloved, free, and then gone. We'd rather charge a fair price and still be here next year. And if you ever leave, your data leaves with you: full export during your subscription and for 90 days after cancellation.
Editor's note (October 1, 2026): Readster now has a free plan. Every account still starts with a 30-day trial of Readster Pro, and Pro subscriptions are still our only revenue — no ads, no selling data. What changed is the end of a trial or a subscription: instead of pausing, the account moves to Readster Free, a weekly brief on up to five topics, and nothing is deleted. We've left the paragraph above as we wrote it in August; the current plans are on the pricing page.
We've read our own brief every morning since the first one the pipeline produced. It's the first thing we've built that made the reading pile feel finished rather than abandoned.
If your bottleneck is triage too, the 30-day trial needs no credit card — add a few topics and see what tomorrow's brief looks like.